Englishbaketsu

How Did This Person Ever Get Hired?

The Gap Between Older Rehired Workers and Modern Office Work

Have you ever thought at work:

  • “This person seriously can’t do their job…”
  • “How did they even pass the hiring exam?”
  • “They keep making mistakes but show no sense of urgency.”
  • “I’m basically covering everything for them.”

This feeling is especially common when dealing with rehired employees in their late 60s or people whose careers were shaped by old-school corporate culture.

Of course, not everyone from that generation is the same.
But it is true that the skills valued in today’s office environment are very different from the skills valued decades ago.

東京都・特別区［1類］教養・専門試験　過去問500　2025年度版 (公務員試験　合格の500シリーズ（教養試験対策）)
created by Rinker
実務教育出版

Office Work Used to Be a Completely Different Game

People who are around 66 years old today entered the workforce around 1980.

Back then, workplaces were built around:

  • Paper documents
  • Handwriting
  • Phone calls and face-to-face communication
  • Following precedent
  • Seniority systems
  • On-the-job learning
  • “Watch and learn” culture

Modern tools and expectations such as:

  • Excel
  • Data analysis
  • Workflow automation
  • Slack
  • Teams
  • Cloud systems
  • Instant response culture

either barely existed or did not exist at all.

In other words, what counted as being “good at office work” back then is very different from what counts today.

Why Some People Seem “Incompetent” Today

Modern office work heavily rewards:

  • Numerical management
  • Logical organization
  • PC skills
  • Multitasking
  • Documentation
  • Speed
  • Adaptability to systems

Meanwhile, older organizational cultures often rewarded:

  • Cooperation
  • Endurance
  • Respect for hierarchy
  • Relationship management
  • Reading social atmosphere
  • Long-term loyalty

As a result, conflict often emerges between:

  • People who work intuitively and socially
    and
  • People who prioritize structure, efficiency, and measurable output

There Was Once a System Where “Not Causing Major Problems” Was Enough

In large organizations during the 1980s and early 1990s, simply:

  • Avoiding major mistakes
  • Not challenging superiors
  • Staying employed for a long time

could be enough to sustain a career.

Especially in large bureaucracies, organizations could function while carrying many employees who were:

“Not exceptional, but not disastrous either.”

But modern workplaces have changed due to:

  • Downsizing
  • Digitization
  • Performance visibility
  • Efficiency pressure
  • Lean staffing

Now, simply “being there” is often no longer enough.

As a result, skill gaps that once stayed hidden have become much more visible.

Rehired Retirement Workers Often Lose Psychological Pressure

After mandatory retirement, many workers return under rehiring systems.

At that stage:

  • Promotion competition is over
  • Responsibility is reduced
  • Salaries are lower
  • Career incentives weaken

So some people naturally become less committed to work.

Not everyone does, of course.

But some enter a mindset of:

  • “I’ve already finished my career.”
  • “I just need to coast quietly.”
  • “Minimum effort is enough.”

When that mindset collides with today’s fast-moving office environment, the burden on coworkers increases sharply.

The Real Problem: Coworkers Become “Support CPUs”

The most exhausting part is often not the person’s incompetence itself.

It’s the fact that everyone around them becomes responsible for compensating.

For example:

  • Fixing their mistakes
  • Double-checking numbers
  • Re-explaining procedures
  • Managing deadlines for them
  • Monitoring their work

In practice, coworkers end up doing:

“their own job + supervision.”

Over time, this creates severe frustration and fatigue.

So What’s the Rational Solution?

The key is:

Stop expecting dramatic personal transformation.

Especially when someone is:

  • Older
  • Rehired after retirement
  • Resistant to learning
  • Highly intuition-driven

major improvement may be unrealistic.

So instead of trying to “fix the person,” it is often more effective to redesign the system.

Practical Countermeasures

1. Reduce Decision-Making

  • Standardize procedures
  • Use checklists
  • Fix input locations

2. Eliminate Verbal-Only Communication

  • Use chat logs
  • Use email
  • Keep written records

3. Design Systems That Prevent Mistakes

  • Automated calculations
  • Input restrictions
  • Dropdown menus
  • Visual alerts

4. Separate Critical Responsibilities

  • Remove them from final approval
  • Keep them away from sensitive numerical work

The goal is not:
“Make everyone highly capable.”

The goal is:
“Build systems that remain stable even with average or weak performers.”

The Real Issue Is Adaptability, Not Age

Ultimately, the strongest workers are the ones who continue adapting and learning.

People who:

  • Learn new tools
  • Update their skills
  • Accept change

can remain highly effective regardless of age.

Meanwhile, people who:

  • Freeze around old success patterns
  • Stop learning
  • Resist change

struggle in modern environments.

And this is not limited to older generations.

Young employees who refuse to adapt eventually face the same problem.

So the deeper issue is not:

“Boomers are incompetent.”

The real issue is:

Whether someone can continue adapting to change.